Home - dogpressorg

The “NAKED TRUTH” about Animal Shelter Tactics by Animal Rightists

If your job has already been axed by the bad economy or is about to disappear, people can often do desperate things in an attempt to compensate. Why should animal shelters be any different.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

5 June 2010

Why should animal shelters be any different; especially when a person considers what is happing inside these organizations, many of which are run by animal rights activists and major big dollar supported nonprofit groups? Some are so passionate that they’d do nearly anything to keep their “humane society imperative” of their animal shelter/rescue agenda going. This information can assist in explaining why pet and animal “over-population stigma” is used as a marketing ploy for rescue and adoption industry to sell their agenda about dogs and cats (rescued for a fee) as being their alleged heroic duty of serving rescued and adopted out dogs and cats.

Tell a family that the dog they’re interested in is about to be destroyed by euthanasia due to “lack of space”, and the deal to adopt is closed. Another dog is then shipped in to take its place as the needed “chattel product” of this high dollar big animal “industry and nonprofit business” nationwide.

After mulling over the phenomenally successful statistics of voluntary spay/neuter by the general public, the question need to be asked; where are all the animal shelters/rescues getting their dogs? Regardless of the facts that most shelter dogs are adult dogs, sadly displaced for many reasons, like due to people moving to covenant-controlled homeowner associations and counties cities with extreme “pet limit” laws, the numbers in shelters do not add up.

Obviously, shelters should be going “out of business” left and right since voluntary spay/neuter nationwide is so successful. After a cursory review of nationwide available statistics it appears that animal euthanasia numbers have been increasing for 20 years, especially to eradicate the “bully breeds” yet, “over-population” is the “mantra” still used by animal shelters and animal rescues favoring their animal rights agendas for furthering their fund-raising, donations, and adopting for a fee (selling) dogs industry to an ill-informed public.

Even the numbers of irresponsible breeding “puppy mills” are nothing like people think it is. The animal rights groups nationwide have succumbed to now including “responsible” dog kennels with more than 50 dogs in perfect care and control conditions as being labeled as “puppy mills” now in their propaganda. Considering the successful voluntary rate of spay/neuter nationwide, it is highly unlikely that accidental pet owner breeding and true defined “puppy mill” irresponsible breeding are filling up animal shelters/rescues to the extent that animal rights groups and animal shelters/rescues claim they are. However, a nationwide dog “chattel” product for a fee industry (dog and cat rescues/adoptions) must come from somewhere.

Make a $$$ Profit (nonprofit) killing or be killed by euthanasia

The general public and all pet and animal owners need to be aware that Animal Rightists lobby with local Animal Shelters and Animal Rescues as “cover.”

The illegal, immoral and illicit care, cruelty and unethical practices in the shelter industry are shocking. And make no mistake, it is a BIG DOLLAR ($$$) rescue/adoption for a fee industry. Many animal rescues and shelters have become some of the most profitable pet shops around that kill anything that does not bring top dollar; or is too much work to place in adoption programs for an adoption or rescue fee. To “give away” a dog or cat, is politically incorrect and unacceptable in their animal rights agenda “chattel” industry. The only Animal Rescue/Shelter agenda acceptable for an “unadoptable” (for a fee) dog or cat is euthanasia, heralded as being so humane.

Single Breed and Pure Bred Rescue organizations have a dreadful time getting pure bred dogs and cats out of the shelter for a fee industry system, simply because shelters/rescues exploit these pure breeds to increase sales and profits (in the hundreds of dollars for a single pure bred dog or cat). Sadly, the “main stream” news media and general public have been willing to look the other way, always promoting the animal rights agenda “cause and effect” of these shelter and rescue illicit industry dog product “chattel” practices.

Why do some humane society shelters operate in this manner?

The answer is that many animal shelters and humane society agencies have become havens for Animal Rightists; shelters and rescues are exploited to spread propaganda, dog and cat “over-population” myths, and faulty statistics for marketing and donation receiving purposes. Shelters and Rescues naturally become a breeding ground for recruiting new uninformed members and animal rights activists. It’s a natural, albeit unhealthy, fit to the animal rights adoption (for a fee) industry “chattel” agenda.

It is no wonder alleged dubious shelter operations are becoming an ever-increasing problem, importing dogs and cats to “over-populate” their agencies from out of state and foreign country animal sources. Thankfully, not all shelters/rescues are this way, but the public should be aware of what is going on. Both Animal Control Authorities and Law enforcement who enforce animal laws and many animal shelters/rescues “have had” their ethics compromised, if not downright corrupted. The end-result is that generally, shelter/rescue workers and animal control authorities and their animal law enforcement agencies assisting them are no longer a credible source for accurate animal care and control information or about proper and constitutional animal behavior and breeding of quality pets, especially when it comes to crafting pet and animal laws.

Animal Rightist propaganda would have us believe that animal abuses and cruelty are at “epidemic” levels in the general public of pet owner’s homes and small hobby or one time family animal breeders, not to mention that dog attacks most certainly receive sensational press coverage.

The main stream media is only too happy to oblige any political opportunism by “animal rights lobbied” politicians, pro-animal control authorities, shelter/rescue agencies, and county or municipal law enforcement or government employees actively pursuing their own “Animal Rightist” agendas. Animal Rights designed animal ordinances have become a means to an end, exploited at the expense of the loving pet owners being made into criminals without “proper and legal “due process” in animal law in our society and in the general public nationwide.

A major percentage of the nation’s animal population, dog attacks, dog fighting, and even animal cruelty and animal care and control or nuisance behavior complaints are rare when all the facts are allegedly disclosed nationwide. As disturbing as these animal care, cruelty, and animal attack incidents are, they are not even close to being the rule… they are by far the exception. Thereby the Animal Rightists are utilizing the “exception to the rule” as an aggressive and nationwide opportunity to enact unconstitutional, intrusive, unethical, vague or illicit animal laws and animal ordinances in a horrendously distasteful and extremely dishonest manner of current and proposed animal law.

When Animal Rightists write ordinances that “Sic” Animal Control Authority

When Animal Rightists write ordinances that “Sic” Animal Control Authorities, Animal Rightist Groups allegedly posing as Law enforcement (CA. PROP 2 laws enacting private nonprofit groups to act as law enforcement on private property) on animal owners and breeders via animal crating, care, control, licensing, pet-limits, and registration schemes in animal law, the very future of healthy well-tempered pets and animals is compromised. No breeding. No pure-bred animals. No healthy genetic stock. Hence, no more pets. No cats. No dogs. No nothing! Forever more! Except for the industry of rescue/shelter adoptions (for a fee).

The only way to prevent these unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and illicit pet owner “confiscation and seizure” horrors from taking root in your own county and community is not to go there in the first place, in allowing these “perverted” animal laws and ordinances. Again, only an open and active pet-friendly county and community create a fun and safe place to live with our pets and neighbors. Animal Rightists, thru their BIG $$$ animal adoption and rescue industry (for a fee) are destroying our current animal laws in having any “common sense” or traditional, constitutional and “intrinsic value” for our pets and animals in the law governing our private property.

A disconcerting trend is sweeping America

The Disconcerting TREND…Costly and destructive animal laws and ordinances being constructed solely by the Animal Rightists with their “lobbied” legislators at all levels of government. The reason stems from an all-out effort by Animal Rightist organizations to lobby every single locale, township, county, city, and state in the U.S.A., Canada and even worldwide. These Animal Rights Activists are searching out lawmakers to exploit and further their twisted and “perverted” agenda to destroy any authority or ability for a private property owner to legally retain and defend their pets and animals as their extended family.

It’s hard to comprehend, but the leadership of the largest and most profitable “non-profit” lobbying Animal Rights organizations has an ambitious goal in mind: Destroying all usage and ownership of domestic animals. That includes, but is not limited to, abolishing pet ownership in every aspect of our society worldwide.

Animal Rightist History Recalled

Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture.

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted “In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the “rights” of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people.” The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.

On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets, which the Jews found humiliating, writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 ‘animal protection laws’ adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets.”

Animal Rightists know full-well that they are not conservative main-stream. However, they’ve been successful in influencing the American lexicon with politically correct words such as “over-population,” “puppy mill,” and “dog attacks.” With major financial support from Hollywood Animal Rightists and an ill-informed public donating money, to include the pet owners themselves, these Animal Rightists and their pro-bono activists and “spoon fed” people spread their animal law propaganda, and inaccuracies about dog behavior. Their legislative proposal packets, slides, videos, etc. are allegedly filled with phony studies, quack testimony, faulty statistics, and other materials that are sent to county, city and state councils or legislators all over the country under the guise of being a reputable source. Once again, the “lame stream” news and main stream press have been all too happy to oblige, publishing sensationalized stories which trump up the credibility of such a nonsensical agenda.

What is missing from these news stories is that these groups do not care one whit about animals, or the welfare of animals, or the health and longevity of pets and animals. This is alleged by the fact of main stream press coverage to the effect that animal rights groups such as PETA, HSUS, or other groups alleged to be saving animals publicly claim to be helping dolphins, whales, polar bears, wolves, or elephants in Africa, etc. but these same groups are allegedly and simultaneously lobbying an all-out assault to destroy any ownership or breeding of dogs, cats, and the family pet at home. This is just plain “evil.”

Do you know the difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights?

“Animal Welfare” is concerned with health, safety, quality of life, and the future of our animals.

“Animal Rights” views domestic animal ownership as “slavery” and seeks to destroy the domestic animal by whatever means necessary. The fastest and most effective way to accomplish this agenda is by using lawmakers to pass prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, or breed specific ordinances (BSL) which includes any dog or animal that even “looks like” a BSL breed whether it is or not, in actuality.

The Ends Justify the Means. These abuses of “perverting” animal law are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage death and destruction on our beloved dogs, pets and animals. Again, the “ends justify the means”.

What exactly is the end result of these animal laws?

Power to Control We the People thru our dogs, pets, and animals. The ensuing corruption contained within the intent to “pervert” influence in the animal laws and animal ordinances aids Animal Rights Activists in the accumulation of wielding more power over the people and to establish a “war chest” of financial wealth thru the very destruction of dog, cat, and pet ownership in animal law thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures and criminal citations. Using and exploiting lawmakers wherever they deem necessary, the Animal Rightist goal of achieving power and wealth at public animal owner expense is in full force.

Even when lawmakers pursue their own agendas, where animal ordinances are concerned, the lawmaker is still a pawn of these Animal Rightist lobbyists. Allegedly by means of having lawmakers being “bought and paid for” thru major financial contributions and donations or other “perks” to get the law makers to make animal laws, according to the agendas of the Animal Rightists.

Fighting Animal Rightist Ideology and helping County, City or State Councils to Properly Reform our “perverted” Animal Rightist Law Agendas, is The Moral of This Story: The lesson to be learned by We the People is that by the time Animal Rightists have taken our counties, municipalities and states hostage and “their” perverted animal laws and ordinances pass, no one knows what has hit them until it is way too late to react with any authority to act.

Animal law and ordinances quickly “compromise the ethics” of Animal Control Authorities and the Law Enforcement agencies enforcing Animal Law with vague and confusing statutes and wordage in the law. These ruthless and irresponsible “perverted” animal law policies are most certainly not something that should have been introduced into animal law; let alone, considered, passed, and enforced by lawmakers and enforced by Law Enforcement. A majority of all these laws “ARE” Unconstitutional. However, it takes a major financial investment and good animal law attorney to be retained at a premium cost, to fight these “unconstitutional” animal laws, that have no “due process” and that is not something the majority of the people can afford to do. These Animal Rightist and lawmakers “know this” and bank on it.

If Anyone Doubts how Serious Things Have Become, Please Read the Following:

The alleged quotes by the Leaders and Activists within the Animal Rightists Movement…

• “Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,” Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June 27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver’s “Dr. Death of Dogs”)

• “We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding.” Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993

NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle’s initial training was similar to that of other PETA activists. Today he heads HSUS under the guise of “legitimacy”. It is the largest and most profitable of the Animal Rightist lobbying organizations.

• “Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation.” Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Just like Us? Harper’s, August 1988, p. 50.

• “As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves.” PETA’s Statement on Companion Animals.

• “We are not especially ‘interested in’ animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn’t ‘love’ animals.” Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface, p. ii.

• “Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership.” Eliot Katz, President in Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website, 2001

• “It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the concept of pet ownership.” Elliot Katz, President “In Defense of Animals,” Spring 1997

• “The cat, like the dog, must disappear… We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist.” John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of a Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 1982, p. 15.

• “My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture.” JP Goodwin employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.

• “Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on earth.” Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President, Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto”

• “We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we win.” Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.

• “Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are ‘acceptable crimes’ when used for the animal cause.” Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA

• “Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works.” Ingrid Newkirk, PETA’s founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002

• “I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001

So how do “We the People” take back our Constitutional Rights in Animal Law?

ANSWER: Courage to Defend Your Private Property, and Your Animals at all costs!

“Courage is not defined by a person’s ability to speak their mind, yelling like a lion’s bellow at authorities and lawmakers about proposed or enacted bad animal laws. Courage is an action of humility, putting one’s cause of honor, before his/her life, to retain the freedom and liberty, which We as People, seek, from an honorable and just God to defend our pets and animals, from oppressive men and women in their secret combinations of Animal Rights law making agendas.” ~ Quote Authored by Dean A. Ayers, NationalDogPress ©

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

“The truth is rarely pure and never simple.”

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the ‘fair use’ exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

Posted January 2, 2010

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

Where is the “over-population” when dogs and cats are transported across state lines and imported from foreign countries to fill up animal shelters?

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

2 January 2010

If your job has already been axed by the bad economy or is about to disappear, people can often do desperate things in an attempt to compensate.

Why should animal shelters be any different; especially when a person considers what is happing inside these organizations, many of which are run by animal rights activists and major big dollar supported nonprofit groups. Some are so passionate that they'd do nearly anything to keep their "humane society imperative" of their animal shelter/rescue agenda going. This information can assist in explaining why pet and animal "over-population stigma” is used as a marketing ploy for rescue and adoption industry to sell their agenda about dogs and cats (rescued for a fee) as being their alleged heroic duty of serving rescued and adopted out dogs and cats.

Tell a family that the dog they're interested in is about to be destroyed by euthanasia due to "lack of space", and the deal to adopt is closed. Another dog is then shipped in to take its place as the needed “chattel product” of this high dollar big animal “industry and nonprofit business” nationwide.

After mulling over the phenomenally successful statistics of voluntary spay/neuter by the general public, the question need to be asked; where are all the animal shelters/rescues getting their dogs? Regardless of the facts that most shelter dogs are adult dogs, sadly displaced for many reasons, like due to people moving to covenant-controlled homeowner associations and counties cities with extreme “pet limit” laws, the numbers in shelters do not add up.

Obviously, shelters should be going “out of business” left and right since voluntary spay/neuter nationwide is so successful. After a cursory review of nationwide available statistics it appears that animal euthanasia numbers have been increasing for 20 years, especially to eradicate the “bully breeds” yet, "over-population" is the “mantra” still used by animal shelters and animal rescues favoring their animal rights agendas for furthering their fund-raising, donations, and adopting for a fee (selling) dogs industry to an ill-informed public.

Even the numbers of irresponsible breeding “puppy mills” are nothing like people think it is. The animal rights groups nationwide have succumbed to now including “responsible” dog kennels with more than 50 dogs in perfect care and control conditions as being labeled as “puppy mills” now in their propaganda. Considering the successful voluntary rate of spay/neuter nationwide, it is highly unlikely that accidental pet owner breeding and true defined “puppy mill” irresponsible breeding are filling up animal shelters/rescues to the extent that animal rights groups and animal shelters/rescues claim they are. However, a nationwide dog “chattel” product for a fee industry(dog and cat rescues/adoptions) must come from somewhere.

Make a $$$ Profit (nonprofit) killing or be killed by euthanasia

The general public and all pet and animal owners need to be aware that Animal Rightists lobby with local Animal Shelters and Animal Rescues as “cover.”

The illegal, immoral and illicit care, cruelty and unethical practices in the shelter industry are shocking. And make no mistake, it is a BIG DOLLAR ($$$) rescue/adoption for a fee industry. Many animal rescues and shelters have become some of the most profitable pet shops around that kill anything that does not bring top dollar; or is too much work to place in adoption programs for an adoption or rescue fee. To “give away” a dog or cat, is politically incorrect and unacceptable in their animal rights agenda “chattel” industry. The only Animal Rescue/Shelter agenda acceptable for an “unadoptable” (for a fee) dog or cat is euthanasia, heralded as being so humane.

Single Breed and Pure Bred Rescue organizations have a dreadful time getting pure bred dogs and cats out of the shelter for a fee industry system, simply because shelters/rescues exploit these pure breeds to increase sales and profits (in the hundreds of dollars for a single pure bred dog or cat). Sadly, the “main stream” news media and general public have been willing to look the other way, always promoting the animal rights agenda “cause and effect” of these shelter and rescue illicit industry dog product “chattel” practices.

Why do some humane society shelters operate in this manner?

The answer is that many animal shelters and humane society agencies have become havens for Animal Rightists; shelters and rescues are exploited to spread propaganda, dog and cat "over-population" myths, and faulty statistics for marketing and donation receiving purposes. Shelters and Rescues naturally become a breeding ground for recruiting new uninformed members and animal rights activists. It's a natural, albeit unhealthy, fit to the animal rights adoption (for a fee) industry “chattel” agenda.

It is no wonder alleged dubious shelter operations are becoming an ever-increasing problem, importing dogs and cats to “over-populate” their agencies from out of state and foreign country animal sources. Thankfully, not all shelters/rescues are this way, but the public should be aware of what is going on. Both Animal Control Authorities and Law enforcement who enforce animal laws and many animal shelters/rescues “have had” their ethics compromised, if not downright corrupted. The end-result is that generally, shelter/rescue workers and animal control authorities and their animal law enforcement agencies assisting them are no longer a credible source for accurate animal care and control information or about proper and constitutional animal behavior and breeding of quality pets, especially when it comes to crafting pet and animal laws.

Animal Rightist propaganda would have us believe that animal abuses and cruelty are at “epidemic” levels in the general public of pet owner’s homes and small hobby or one time family animal breeders, not to mention that dog attacks most certainly receive sensational press coverage.

The main stream media is only too happy to oblige any political opportunism by “animal rights lobbied” politicians, pro-animal control authorities, shelter/rescue agencies, and county or municipal law enforcement or government employees actively pursuing their own “Animal Rightist” agendas. Animal Rights designed animal ordinances have become a means to an end, exploited at the expense of the loving pet owners being made into criminals without “proper and legal “due process” in animal law in our society and in the general public nationwide.

A major percentage of the nation’s animal population, dog attacks, dog fighting, and even animal cruelty and animal care and control or nuisance behavior complaints are rare when all the facts are allegedly disclosed nationwide. As disturbing as these animal care, cruelty, and animal attack incidents are, they are not even close to being the rule... they are by far the exception. Thereby the Animal Rightists are utilizing the “exception to the rule” as an aggressive and nationwide opportunity to enact unconstitutional, intrusive, unethical, vague or illicit animal laws and animal ordinances in a horrendously distasteful and extremely dishonest manner of current and proposed animal law.

When Animal Rightists write ordinances that “Sic” Animal Control Authorities, Animal Rightist Groups allegedly posing as Law enforcement (CA. PROP 2 laws enacting private nonprofit groups to act as law enforcement on private property) on animal owners and breeders via animal crating, care, control, licensing, pet-limits, and registration schemes in animal law, the very future of healthy well-tempered pets and animals is compromised. No breeding. No pure-bred animals. No healthy genetic stock. Hence, no more pets. No cats. No dogs. No nothing! Forever more! Except for the industry of rescue/shelter adoptions (for a fee).

The only way to prevent these unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and illicit pet owner “confiscation and seizure” horrors from taking root in your own county and community is not to go there in the first place, in allowing these “perverted” animal laws and ordinances. Again, only an open and active pet-friendly county and community create a fun and safe place to live with our pets and neighbors. Animal Rightists, thru their BIG $$$ animal adoption and rescue industry (for a fee) are destroying our current animal laws in having any “common sense” or traditional, constitutional and “intrinsic value” for our pets and animals in the law governing our private property.

A disconcerting trend is sweeping America

The Disconcerting TREND…Costly and destructive animal laws and ordinances being constructed solely by the Animal Rightists with their “lobbied” legislators at all levels of government. The reason stems from an all-out effort by Animal Rightist organizations to lobby every single locale, township, county, city, and state in the U.S.A., Canada and even worldwide. These Animal Rights Activists are searching out lawmakers to exploit and further their twisted and “perverted” agenda to destroy any authority or ability for a private property owner to legally retain and defend their pets and animals as their extended family.

It's hard to comprehend, but the leadership of the largest and most profitable "non-profit" lobbying Animal Rights organizations has an ambitious goal in mind: Destroying all usage and ownership of domestic animals. That includes, but is not limited to, abolishing pet ownership in every aspect of our society worldwide.

Animal Rightist History Recalled

Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture.

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted "In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the "rights" of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people." The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.

On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets, which the Jews found humiliating, writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 'animal protection laws' adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets."

Animal Rightists know full-well that they are not conservative main-stream. However, they've been successful in influencing the American lexicon with politically correct words such as "over-population," “puppy mill,” and “dog attacks.” With major financial support from Hollywood Animal Rightists and an ill-informed public donating money, to include the pet owners themselves, these Animal Rightists and their pro-bono activists and “spoon fed” people spread their animal law propaganda, and inaccuracies about dog behavior. Their legislative proposal packets, slides, videos, etc. are allegedly filled with phony studies, quack testimony, faulty statistics, and other materials that are sent to county, city and state councils or legislators all over the country under the guise of being a reputable source. Once again, the “lame stream” news and main stream press have been all too happy to oblige, publishing sensationalized stories which trump up the credibility of such a nonsensical agenda.

What is missing from these news stories is that these groups do not care one whit about animals, or the welfare of animals, or the health and longevity of pets and animals. This is alleged by the fact of main stream press coverage to the effect that animal rights groups such as PETA, HSUS, or other groups alleged to be saving animals publicly claim to be helping dolphins, whales, polar bears, wolves, or elephants in Africa, etc. but these same groups are allegedly and simultaneously lobbying an all-out assault to destroy any ownership or breeding of dogs, cats, and the family pet at home. This is just plain “evil.”

Do you know the difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights?

“Animal Welfare” is concerned with health, safety, quality of life, and the future of our animals.

“Animal Rights” views domestic animal ownership as "slavery" and seeks to destroy the domestic animal by whatever means necessary. The fastest and most effective way to accomplish this agenda is by using lawmakers to pass prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, or breed specific ordinances (BSL) which includes any dog or animal that even “looks like” a BSL breed whether it is or not, in actuality.

The Ends Justify the Means. These abuses of “perverting” animal law are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage death and destruction on our beloved dogs, pets and animals. Again, the "ends justify the means".

What exactly is the end result of these animal laws?

Power to Control We the People thru our dogs, pets, and animals. The ensuing corruption contained within the intent to “pervert” influence in the animal laws and animal ordinances aids Animal Rights Activists in the accumulation of wielding more power over the people and to establish a “war chest” of financial wealth thru the very destruction of dog, cat, and pet ownership in animal law thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures and criminal citations. Using and exploiting lawmakers wherever they deem necessary, the Animal Rightist goal of achieving power and wealth at public animal owner expense is in full force.

Even when lawmakers pursue their own agendas, where animal ordinances are concerned, the lawmaker is still a pawn of these Animal Rightist lobbyists. Allegedly by means of having lawmakers being “bought and paid for” thru major financial contributions and donations or other “perks” to get the law makers to make animal laws, according to the agendas of the Animal Rightists.

Fighting Animal Rightist Ideology and helping County, City or State Councils to Properly Reform our “perverted” Animal Rightist Law Agendas, is The Moral of This Story: The lesson to be learned by We the People is that by the time Animal Rightists have taken our counties, municipalities and states hostage and “their” perverted animal laws and ordinances pass, no one knows what has hit them until it is way too late to react with any authority to act.

Animal law and ordinances quickly “compromise the ethics” of Animal Control Authorities and the Law Enforcement agencies enforcing Animal Law with vague and confusing statutes and wordage in the law. These ruthless and irresponsible “perverted” animal law policies are most certainly not something that should have been introduced into animal law; let alone, considered, passed, and enforced by lawmakers and enforced by Law Enforcement. A majority of all these laws “ARE” Unconstitutional. However, it takes a major financial investment and good animal law attorney to be retained at a premium cost, to fight these “unconstitutional” animal laws, that have no “due process” and that is not something the majority of the people can afford to do. These Animal Rightist and lawmakers “know this” and bank on it.

If Anyone Doubts how Serious Things Have Become, Please Read the Following:

The alleged quotes by the Leaders and Activists within the Animal Rightists Movement…

• "Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,'' Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June 27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver's "Dr. Death of Dogs")

• "We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993

NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle's initial training was similar to that of other PETA activists. Today he heads HSUS under the guise of "legitimacy". It is the largest and most profitable of the Animal Rightist lobbying organizations.

• "Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation." Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Just Like Us? Harper's, August 1988, p. 50.

• "As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." PETA's Statement on Companion Animals.

• "We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn't 'love' animals." Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface, p. ii.

• "Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership." Eliot Katz, President In Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website, 2001

• "It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the concept of pet ownership." Elliot Katz, President "In Defense of Animals," Spring 1997

• "The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of A Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 1982, p. 15.

• "My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.

• "Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on earth." Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President, Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto"

• "We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we win." Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.

• "Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are 'acceptable crimes' when used for the animal cause." Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA

• "Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002

• "I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001

So how do “We the People” take back our Constitutional Rights in Animal Law?

ANSWER: Courage to Defend Your Private Property, and Your Animals at all costs!

"Courage is not defined by a person's ability to speak their mind, yelling like a lion's bellow at authorities and lawmakers about proposed or enacted bad animal laws. Courage is an action of humility, putting one's cause of honor, before his/her life, to retain the freedom and liberty, which We as People, seek, from an honorable and just God to defend our pets and animals, from oppressive men and women in their secret combinations of Animal Rights law making agendas." ~ Quote Authored by Dean A. Ayers, NationalDogPress ©

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2010, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 01/02/2010 at 01:48 AM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your Dog, "Mark of the Beast" in Obama Care, 'We the People' with dogs and animals, A Chicken Lesson for Dog Owners, ALASKA Takes On SARAH PALIN, Alleged Dog or Animal Abuse News, Animal Control, Animal Control Officers, Animal Law, Animal Laws, Animal Rescues, Animal Rights Activists, Animal Shelter RIver Filling With Dogs, Animal Shelters, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom 50 + Article Links, Bad Smelling Pets, Books, C.L.U.B. QUOTE, Cat Executions in Omaha, Nebraska, Catholic Church PETA Sex Offends, Citizen Dog Walkers , Current Affairs, Debating the Humane Society, DemoRATS Pass ObamaCare RFID Chipping, Doctor DEATH, Dog and Human Euthanasia Unethical, Dog Catchers, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Kennel Owner Abuse, Dog Law, Dog Laws, Dog License Tyranny, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Owner "Due Process" THE LAW or LACK of!, Dog Rescue Action Needed, Dog Taxation , Dog Taxes, Dogs, Pets, and Animals, DUE PROCESS, Due Process in Animal Laws, Dweebs in Animal Control, Euthanasia, Film, Fisherman TAKE ON Sarah Palin, WOW!, Flaming Liberal Swords, Food and Drink, Fort Hood, Texas MUSLIM Gunman, Freedom and Happiness, Freedom and Liberty, Freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, Games, Glenwood, Iowa, GlenwoodIowa.org, Government Owned Dogs, Govt. Owns YOUR Computer Info., H1N1 Cat Flu Confirmed, Healing Power of Dogs, Health Care, HEALTH CARE ALERT, Healthcare, Taxes, Public Option, and BULLSHIT, HSUS, HSUS Alleged Criminal Activity, HSUS Alleged Intimidation of Free Speech, HSUS Allegedly Impersonating Law Enforcement in CA Prop 2, HSUS and PETA Exaggeration into Lies, HSUS Intimidation Debate, HSUS law enforcement training camps, Humane Health Care?, Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society Scam, IMPEACH OBAMA, INSANITY in Society, Iowa Puppy Mill Bull!, Islam and Terrorism, Islam, Muslims, and Dogs, Life's Troubles, Mills County, Iowa, Mills County, Iowa , MillsCounty.Org, Mormon Prophecy about the USA, Music, Muslim Major Tied to 9/11, MUSLIM U.S. Army Gunman, My Dogs..., NAIS Animal ID, NationalDogPress Newsletter, NationalDogPress©, NationalDogPress© Magazine Cover, NEA Teachers Union, Nebraska Humane Society - NOT!, Nincompoops, No Dogs in Canada and the USA , Non-Voters For Companion Animals Satire, Obama "Walking Eagle", Obama State Dinner Gate - Satire, OBAMA Transition Team Has MUSLIM Murderer, ObamaCare, Obamanation, Our Nation Won't Survive, Pet Euthanasia is Unethical, Pet Food, PETA, PETA DEATH CAMPS, PETA PORN ADS, Polk County "Number Limit" Tyranny, Private Property Intrusion, PROP 2, Puppy Mill Bull!, Religion, RFID Chips, RFID Chips in Dogs, No Way!, Rogue in 2012, Sarah Palin , Sarah Palin or Satire , SARAH PALIN FOR PRESIDENT in 2012, Sarah Palin HELP!, Satire, Science, Sexual Harassment Must Go!, Socialist America, Sports, Swine Flu Fraud?, Teachers , Television, Terrorist Designation for PETA, Thank You!, The HSUS, the MOB, and the Black EGG, The MOB, The Religion of the Dog, Toxins on Dogs and Our Pets, Travel, USDA, USDA ACCESS WARNING, Web/Tech, Weblogs, Welfare State | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Digg This | Save to del.icio.us

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as rescues, and shelters on animal law, and the impact of animal rights

HSUS, Humane Society of the United States; HSUS, The MOB and the Black Egg of the HSUS

Posted December 25, 2009

HSUS, Humane Society of the United States; HSUS, The MOB and the Black Egg of the HSUS

NationalDogPress ©

Debating the "Truth or Friction" of the Humane Society of the United States

ORIGINAL ARTICLE LINK: http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/

"Once in the racket you're always in it."

Al Capone

Make sure you have your seat belts on and lets proceed.

In this NationalDogPress © Magazine Issue on the HSUS

· The MOB, H$U$ and the Black EGG

· THE MOB

· ENTER H$U$

· BEST FRIENDS - KNUCKLING UNDER TO H$U$ TAKE OVER?

· H$U$ - Humane $ociety of the United $tates

· THE BLACK EGG

· California State Legislature Votes To Pay H$U$ Protection Money

· EDITOR'S NOTE. . .

· Disclaimer

· Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

The MOB, H$U$ and the Black EGG

THE MOB

Scarface Capone would have been proud of the Mafia's advance into mainstream America and world markets. Organized crime in the last 80 years has become highly educated and extremely sophisticated. Children of the Mafiosi had the money to attend Princeton, Harvard, Columbia and Yale to obtain the best educations in Environmental and Political Science, Law, Business and Non Profit Law. It is common knowledge that the Feds could not take down Capone in any other way but through the Internal Revenue Service. What would be a dream come true for the mob and its rackets would be a business that one could launder money through, lots of money, far beyond what the old Italian restaurant money laundering racket served up. What better "racket" than Non Profit organizations, layered and affiliated for money laundering ease, and best of all, EXEMPT from taxes.

While at college, these next generation soon-to-be professionals with credentials and degrees often become involved in Environmentalism courtesy of ultra left professors such as Peter Singer. Singer is the master of indoctrination and manipulation of these young students that come to study at Harvard and Princeton. He is well known as the "Father of the Animal Rights Movement" which he admits was an experiment with a political social movement class. He admittedly cares nothing for animals, or for that matter, humans as one can ascertain from many of his statements such as "killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living."[29] Obama recently appointed him as advisor to Cass Sunstein, the Harvard law professor, who is Obama's nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory affairs - the so-called "regulation czar". Singer advocates the moral equality of humans and animals.

When Singer's appointment to Princeton's faculty was announced in 1998, billionaire alumnus and presidential candidate Steve Forbes pledged not to give a dime to the school until he left the faculty. Nonetheless, Singer is still advising students and teaching "Practical Ethics," one of the most popular courses at the university. How did Singer, an atheist, become the God of Ethics? Isn't this the same attitude that Hitler possessed? Many that have studied Singer believe he emulates Hitler and has had a perverse fixation on the Fuhrer since early childhood. How Singer can then twist the atrocities of the Nazis into an argument for bioethics is mind-boggling considering that Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture.

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted "In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the "rights" of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people." The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. [10] In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.[23] On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets,[20] which the Jews found humiliating.[23] writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 'animal protection laws' adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets."

Combine the animal rights movement and organized crime and the result is one of the biggest scams in American corporate history. The animal rights movement has taken over the animal welfare charities also referred to as non profit 501(c)3 corporations.

Non profits pay no taxes and are rarely audited. There is really no oversight set up for the non profits so it is easy to abuse what used to be public charity funds. Al Capone would be proud. Tax free money hires high dollar lobbyists to control Congress and state legislatures. The non profit corporations in turn write legislation that are voted into laws favorable for them. To get cooperation from politicians, campaign coffers overflow with millions in laundered mob money.

The New Generation of Mafia Children have devised a way to get "protection" money and launder huge sums of dirty money on a corporate level. The big money lobbyists grease the wheels of politicians with the promise of huge campaign donations and fund- raising if their Bill is voted into law. Since there is a limit on campaign donations, they circumvent the law with 527 Political Organizations which are without limits. This is illegal, and in actuality, is another powerful arm of racketeering.

ENTER H$U$

In 1992, the California State Attorney General revoked the Charter of the Humane $ociety of the United $tates for criminal behavior unbecoming a public charity. H$U$ would never be allowed to do business in the state of California again. This action followed a string of fraud, embezzlement, investigation by the SEC, and their well known ties to Underworld figures such as Antonio Giacalone. "Tony Jack", the infamous head of the Detroit mob is accused of ordering or being involved in the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK as well as Teamsters legend Jimmy Hoffa.

Giacalone and his attorney, DeDay LaRene were convicted for conspiracy and tax evasion and went to prison in 1994. Mob attorney DeDay LaRene' was then paroled in 1995 to The Humane $ociety of the United $tates (H$U$). One has to wonder why a non profit public charity would want or need a brilliant mob attorney working for them? LaRene' lost his Bar license and privilege to practice law in Michigan, but has his license in Maryland.

Wills was accused by Sandra LeBost of Royal Oak, Michigan that he never repaid a loan of $28,311 and her father's gold watch worth $10,000. Far from a coincidence, LaRene's wife, Joan Witt, and David Wills VP of the H$U$ were both on the Board of Directors of the Michigan Humane Society. Wills and others were accused of embezzlement when the non profit went under after trying to unionize the workers. Wills headed for NSAP, now dormant, for many years before taking the job at HSUS. Joan Witt, DeDay LaRene's wife, followed Wills from her humane society post in Nashua, New Hampshire to MHS, (Maryland Humane Society) where a similar story played out with embezzlement charges thrown at David Wills and the Board. They both then moved onto the HSUS.

David Wills and Wayne Pacelle once college roommates were friends while Pacelle was with the radical animal rights organization, Fund For Animals. Pacelle then went to work for the H$U$ with Wills in 1994. Soon both were accused of embezzling funds for their flamboyant Mexican wedding. Wills who was being groomed for the top post was charged with embezzlement and left H$U$ leaving a question as to the possibility of Pacelle rolling over on or even setting up Wills, in order to become the next president of H$U$. It is not unusual for the mob to often set up an executive to take the fall for a crime.

Wills married the ex-wife of Alex Pacheco (who helped found PeTA along with Englishwoman, Ingrid Newkirk) and Pacelle married the secretary for Ark Trust, Kristen Rosenberg. Again, it is a mob tactic to marry for power or alliance strengthening so even a short term marriage in order to achieve his goals for H$U$ is not inconceivable. Perhaps it was a way to get H$U$'s foot in the door to do business in California since they were there. It was a known fact that the founder, Gretchen Wyler, had cancer. The plan worked and Ark Trust is now manned by Pacelle and was re-named North Hollywood Office of H$U$.

One of the most interesting of ever-mounting animal charities being taken over by H$U$ is the Doris Day Animal League. FBI Investigations of drug running/smuggling, and/or mob involvement haunt DDAL. The FBI drug investigation was kept quiet. This information came via a former FBI agent. It wasn't a big leap for DDAL to join organized crime infested H$U$. This merger pretty much says it all for non profits.

The most intriguing DDAL story is that Doris Day's son, Terry Melcher, who was CEO of DDAL, was not only involved with Charles Manson, the mob, H$U$, and illegal drugs but also with a Satanic cult called The Process of which Manson was also a member. The infamous and horrific Sharon Tate murders were committed in Terry Melcher's home by the Manson Family.

Melcher produced the Byrds, Paul Revere and the Raiders, David Cassidy and as well as the Beach Boys for Columbia Records. The Beach Boys (the Wilson brothers) introduced Melcher to Charlie Manson who was living with them at the time. Manson wanted Melcher to produce his music. Melcher never completed the project which was to include a film of Charlie Manson. Dennis Wilson, Manson's supporter, mysteriously drowned in the Marina del Rey December 28th, 1983.

Terry Melcher and his girlfriend, Candice Bergen, were living together at 10050 Cielo Drive in Los Angeles where sex and drug orgies were attended by the elite of Hollywood and the music industry. Melcher sub-let to Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate shortly after dropping Manson's project. When the Sharon Tate murders occurred some of the evidence included pornographic and sadistic movies taken of famous guests including Tate. Even John Lennon and George Harrison mentioned staying and doing drugs many times at Melcher's home. The drug connection seems to be the link between all parties with LSD "Orange Sunshine" being the common denominator especially linking the equally gruesome LaBianca murders that occurred days after the Tate murder. Two of the men murdered along with Tate are Jay Sebring, her ex- beau and Hollywood hairdresser who the movie "Shampoo" was supposedly written about and a Polish immigrant, Woytek Frykowski, both who were dealing drugs including "Orange Sunshine LSD".

It was said that Rosemary LaBianca dealt this specific LSD manufactured in Malibu and Laguna Beach and that her husband Leno was deeply involved in the Las Vegas gambling syndicate. Leno was in debt to mobster Frankie Carpo, an associate of the infamous New York Don Frank Costello (that Jack Nicholson portrayed in the movie, The Departed), who Manson served as an apprentice to while doing time in the same prison. Manson had tried to obtain "the black book" that Leno had as well as shake him down for money and without finding the book, savagely killed Leno and his wife. With all the facts at hand, it appears Manson was a hit man.

After Manson was arrested, Melcher went into intense psychiatric treatment. Melcher was the only witness that was visibly shaking at Manson's trial. Was it from his involvement or fear of Manson?

Doris Day and her son left a wake of murders and suicides following them. Two of Day's three husbands mysteriously committed suicide. These suicides were not investigated. One of them was Melcher's adoptive dad (Terry's biological father was Al Jordan, Day's 1st marriage) who was accused by Day of embezzling her entire $20 Million dollar fortune. Doris Day was not the virginal all American girl that the studios portrayed, but that's another story in itself.

The details of how H$U$ "inherited" the Doris Day Animal League from Terry Melcher who died prematurely from melanoma are murky but suffice it to say, Pacelle was now in control of the biggest name animal organizations in California and the nation.

BEST FRIENDS - KNUCKLING UNDER TO H$U$ TAKE OVER?

The founding members of The Process, a satanic worship cult "church" were basically struggling to survive, unable to get sufficient donations to keep their church running upon immigrating from England to the United States. At this time they were in Arizona. The Process had tried Santa Cruz, Los Angeles and San Francisco where they picked up Manson and his followers. Sacrifices of skinned and blood drained dogs followed their every move. This pattern of complaints followed the Process Cult as it moved across the nation.

There are links to Son of Sam murders and sex/snuff films as well with murders of filmographers and others that trail the several chapters of the Process across the nation.

The founders of the Process Church attended an animal charity fund-raiser in Washington DC and were astounded at how people were throwing money at this 501(c)3 charity. That's when the founding members of The Process realized that it was easier to raise money for animals than for Satan. The founding members returned to Arizona and switched gears. Their organization was re-named BEST FRIENDS, and they moved to Kanab, Utah.

It seems the "wake" of death and destruction not only follows DDAL but also H$U$ whenever there is about to be the take-over of another "Associate Organization", as Wayne Pacelle calls it. A founder of Best Friends died in an unexplained car accident on his way back to the Best Friends Sanctuary. Best Friends admits that they were The Process Cult Church that sacrificed pets, but it's a little different when they themselves are up for sacrifice. The Founding Members never counted on they themselves being murdered if they objected to take- over or "changing of the guard" as was stated to this writer in 2008 before "The Recent Accident" by one of the original founding members. Who knew Ernst Paul Eckhoff, 72, of Kanab would be dead in a few months in a mysterious single car (?) roll-over accident!

PHOTO: Charlie Manson 1969 said to be a member of Process Church

It is rumored that a rendering plant was built nearby the Best Friends "Sanctuary" to dispose of the animals. It certainly could help keep things tidy after a bloody sacrifice.

For those that are inclined to dismiss The Process' involvement in these crimes, consider the fact that the night before Robert F. Kennedy was killed, RFK accompanied Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski to a dinner party at the Malibu home of John Frankenheimer, the Director of the movie, The Manchurian Candidate. After the party, Frankenheimer then drove Kennedy back to the Ambassador Hotel. His assassin, Sirhan Sirhan, had visited a member of The Process that worked in the kitchen at the Ambassador Hotel the day before where Kennedy was gunned down. Kennedy was the most courageous and committed Attorney General this nation has ever had when it came to fighting organized crime.

H$U$ - Humane $ociety of the United $tates

A little known fact is that Wayne Pacelle's brother, Richard Jr, is a professor at Georgia Southern University and teaches Non Profit Law. Could it be that he is the brains behind his brother's strategy and criminal career at H$U$ by using the law to circumvent the existing law.

Richard Pacelle's specialty is teaching Non Profit Law. Wife Fenton Strickland is the head of the research collection in Political Science at Indiana University

Pictured right are wife Fenton Strickland, Mom Pat Pacelle, Richard Pacelle Jr

"The Pacelle Family name is spelled Pacelli"

"Pacelle appears to have been Pacelli when the family arrived in the United States.."

"My life is pretty much like a cross between "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" and "The Soprano's"."

The quotes above are from Richard Pacelle, Jr.'s website. Richard equates his family to the "Sopranos"?

When a reporter mispronounced Wayne's name, ballistic comes to mind regarding Wayne's reaction. Why? Could it be the ties to the organized crime underworld? Upon reviewing Wayne Pacelli's Family Tree one finds some very interesting characters not only from the "Old Country Italy" but from Al Capone's infamous St. Valentine's Day Massacre. The man credited with the planning and orchestration of the St Valentine's Massacre was William Pacelli, right hand man for Capone. William Pacelli was also elected three times as Chicago representative for the state of Illinois. Was this Uncle Bill from the St. Valentine's Massacre credited with planning the gruesome crime that shocked America?

Other well known Mob names are laced throughout the Wayne Pacelli Family Tree also. Maselli sometimes spelled Masselli, like those in the New Jersey and Rhode Island Crime Families pops up often. In an article in Time Magazine, William Masselli is described by the FBI as a "self-admitted soldier" in the Genovese Mafia family.

The Pacelle brothers are not to be underestimated for their criminal genius. Wayne not only sits on the Board of many non-profits but he and his other H$U$ Board members and longtime "associates" also own or sit on the Boards of many of the for profit corporations. The for profit corporations service H$U$ such as the marketing mail houses that receive millions each year from H$U$ to solicit via the US Postal Service for donations. as well as lockbox corporations that receive the actual donations (envelope openers). These donations are then used to pay these service companies and salaries of H$U$ personnel with only 4% of the total income for H$U$ going to help animals in any direct way.

Before Pacelle took the helm of H$U$, the reported income was nearly $2 million dollars annually. Now they report over $100 million in income per year. What charity has ever made this kind of a leap in history? H$U$ paid over $881,000 to Exciting New Technologies, owned by the main internet support service for on-line pornography and internet gambling. Ex H$U$ president Dr. Irwin's son, Chris, was hired as Director of Business Development by the owner of ENT, Gordon, a mail and bank fraud felon. Dr. Irwin moved to the position of CEO of the American Bible Society, where $5 million went to ENT within two years time. Once the pornographic background was revealed, Irwin was dismissed from his post by a very embarrassed American Bible Society.

THE BLACK EGG of the HSUS

Singer writes in his paper, Heavy Petting,"Some men use hens as a sexual object, inserting their penis into the cloaca, an all-purpose channel for wastes and for the passage of the egg. This is usually fatal to the hen, and in some cases she will be deliberately decapitated just before ejaculation in order to intensify the convulsions of its sphincter."This is cruelty, clear and simple. (But is it worse for the hen than living for a year or more crowded with four or five other hens in barren wire cage so small that they can never stretch their wings, and then being stuffed into crates to be taken to the slaughterhouse, strung upside down on a conveyor belt and killed? If not, then it is no worse than what egg producers do to their hens all the time.)"

Pacelle showed up uninvited and unannounced, at a Pacific North West Egg Producer Convention prior to the filing of the California initiative later to be called "Prop 2". Wayne Pacelle made them an offer, off the record, which in this case they refused.

The use of classic mob tactics which encompasses fear, threat, intimidation and extortion (racketeering) are exactly what was employed against the egg producers by refusing to "play ball" with Pacelle. H$U$ promptly financed the Initiative for "hen welfare" in California. The implementation of Prop 2, , will put egg producers out of business and devastate the agricultural industry in California. Beef, pork and dairy producers will soon join the egg producers' exodus from California. This is reminiscent of the space industry's exodus and the "depression" that followed in California.

Next, Neil Trent animal rights extremist and CEO of HSI (Humane $ociety International) was placed as Director of the Marin Humane $ociety just before Prop 2. Neil Trent's timely appearance pushed out a very competent shelter director who had run the Marin Humane Society for 20 years. Soon Neil Trent now as Director of The Marin Humane Society was speaking in support for Prop 2. Why would he leave a position at the top of H$I to run a small time local humane society.

Was Neil Trent "placed" in this liberal wealthy California locale in order to garner support and financing for Prop 2? Neil Trent abruptly left the Marin Humane Society shortly after Prop 2 was passed.

Another strategic placement happened at the prestigious San Francisco SPCA. It's new Director from Colorado, a hotbed for punitive animal legislation, Jan McHugh-Smith played hostess to the Prop 2 rallies held by Wayne Pacelle himself. Wayne Pacelle and Neil Trent (Pacelle's Capo) were side by side at the rally in Marin County. Pacelle said in the moment of excitement after three hours of mind- control dribble, "Are you inspired by your Co- Religionists? " Pacelle and Neil Trent were leading an apparent revival meeting soliciting members for Pacelle's "1000 Club". Planted "ringers" in the audience much like at corrupt auction house would jump up and shout "I'll get a thousand signatures". This club is for those who obtained 1000 plus signatures to get the Prop 2 initiative on the ballot in California to overthrow free enterprise for farmers and ranchers. Wayne said over and over in a monotone hypnotic voice, "hens in barren wire cages so small that they can never stretch their wings, or turn around" for three hours.

Prop 2 passed by uninformed voters in CA not realizing that the price of eggs would double before Prop 2 was in place and may very well quadruple the price of eggs before January 1, 2015. But that was only phase one. The most important piece of the puzzle for control of the food production of California was yet to drop.

AB 1437, the Shelled EGG Bill, was sponsored by Jared Huffman, a first-time Democrat Assembly member from Mill Valley (Marin County) during the present legislative session (2009). There are no egg growers in Mill Valley nor Marin County. Why is Huffman sponsoring this Bill? Huffman claims it is for "hen welfare". Seemingly, legislators have forgotten about the welfare of their constituency, the consumer. There is no other food product that is used more than eggs. The reasons it affects the price of food more than any other animal food product is because there are eggs in almost all processed foods, such as baked goods, crackers, cookies, pancake mix, and in frozen prepared foods as emulsifiers and stabilizers as well as to boost the nutritional content of foods.

After an examination of campaign donations to the Prop 2 campaign organization, Californians For Humane Farms by the Fair Political Practices Commission, it was advised that the donations represented RICO activity and should be investigated by the Attorney General's Office.

H$U$ has found a way to bypass the campaign donation limitations by laundering the money through employees of H$U$and it's "Associate Member Organizations". H$U$'s 501(c)3 non profit "loaned" $500,000 to DDAL a 501(c)4 organization, (whom they own) to lobby Prop 2 in California which goes into effect in 2015. The 501(c)3 organizations are forbidden to "loan" or "give" money to 527 organizations by the IRS and under the Fair Political Practices Act. This has been reported repeatedly but is ignored not only by the IRS but by the Attorney General of the State of California. When a Senator's staff was asked why no investigation was ongoing, the response was "Jerry Brown is running for Governor. He won't be making waves."

However, Jerry Brown, a dyed in the wool Democrat, also looked the other way during the Katrina disaster, when a multitude of complaints were levied against H$U$ for misappropriating the $35 million in direct donations intended for hurricane victims. Yet, Brown did prosecute a smaller charity, Noah's Wish, that received $8 million in Katrina donations which were seized by Brown. What is also missing are the pets supposedly "rescued."

What the above persons and organizations will eventually find out is that they were set up and used by Pacelle at H$U$ to commit crimes for him and the furtherance of organized crime and his future "political" career. The end result will be a black market that drives the price of eggs through the roof, loss of jobs, businesses and tax revenues for the state at a time when California is teetering at the precipice of bankruptcy.

Prop 2 enables H$U$ to not only inspect but raid anyone involved in animal production agriculture in California. If H$U$ finds animal cruelty, the H$U$ is allowed to seize, keep, sell anything they steal from California's farmers as well as heavily fine farmers and send farmers to prison. H$U$ wants to do away with the California Department of Agriculture and take their place. For this end, Pacelle is pulling the strings of the 2nd most powerful Senator in the State Legislature, Dean Florez. California's Dept. of Agriculture is probably the only agency running in the black in California. This is the conduit for "protection money" to flow to H$U$. What better way for organized crime to operate than through a non profit within the state structure. It would never be audited by the IRS. The perks are, the H$U$ appointed criminals, many of whom are felons, can legally carry guns and shoot anyone they'd like to remove. They can steal, keep, sell and profit from all the farmers they want to put out of business. What are California Legislators thinking putting VEGANS armed with weapons in charge of MEAT and EGG GROWERS?

The California legislators are NOT thinking. They are being bribed. A bribe is not just money, it is anything that is promised or accepted in order to obtain a vote on a Bill or Law that the briber can profit from and the legislator receives some advantage which can be sex, a sweater (as in US v Frega of San Diego) the promise of a Campaign Donation. It is also Racketeering. Former Judge Adams is still in Lompoc Federal Prison, just ask him.

It's not just H$U$ that is bribing and running a racketeering scheme and artifice, they are dragging other non profits into their bloody corrupt pit. H$U$ donated $10,000 to Judi Mancuso's 501(c)3 group called $ocial Compassion that has been leading the attack against pet owners to fine and seize any and all pets not sterilized. Again, shadows of the Nazi horrors. Judi Mancuso then turned around and gave the entire $10,000 to Senator Majority Leader Darrell Steinberg's 527 campaign organization. It is illegal for Social Compassion to donate money to a 527. Now, Mancuso and other organizations are staging to wage a war on farmers with groups like Animal Cruelty Investigators, a rogue SPCA whose main board member, the husband of longtime PeTA employee, Jane Garrison, is partners with Mancuso's husband, Rolf Wicklund, a cousin of the notorious ALF spokesperson and admitted operative, Freeman Wicklund. Freeman Wicklund also headed the radical organization, COKS, and then not so coincidentally, Mercy For Animals, that set up a Fresno chicken farmer for a faked undercover expose on chicken abuse during the Prop 2 campaign.

California State Legislature Votes To Pay H$U$ Protection Money

If by now, you are wondering how is it conceivably legal to seize a citizen's property under such quasi guidelines as a chicken being able to stretch their wings, the answer is corruption within the legislature.

Since 1993 citizens in the state of California have begged the Attorney General, the local District Attorneys and Law Enforcement to investigate the illegal issuance of search and seizure warrants by Superior Court Judges to private, non profit 501(c)3 corporations.

These warrants are issued to SPCA and Humane Societies to do Home Invasion Robberies and file false fabricated criminal charges against property owners to, bottom line, be awarded large "restitution orders" from the Judge. The Judge automatically signs a criminal Abstract of Judgment for from $250,000 to $850,000. This then enables the Non Profit Private Corporation to lien and force sale or seize the home or property.

The California Constitution Article 2, Section 12 specifically states that "The Legislature Shall Not Give Any Power To A Private Person or Private Corporation".

The State of California Legislature violated the California Constitution in 1995 with 607f of the Civil Code. When caught, Assemblymember Louis Caldera had it repealed in 1996. * Seems scandal follows the former California Assemblymember.

Caldera was appointed by President Obama as Director of the Military January 9, 2009. He resigned May 22 after accepting responsibility as the scapegoat for the Air Force One fly over scandal in New York that left many New Yorkers in a state of terror and panic.

In 1997, the president, of spca/LA, Madeline Bernstein, became outraged with Caldera and wrote a scathing but self-incriminating letter* to Caldera admitting that "she had even written the Humane Officer Bill and did everything Bernstein and Caldera had agreed on in order for Caldera to put this law in place." (Employees and volunteers for 501(c)3's are not to be involved in the political process at all or they lose their non profit status, as per IRS code)

Bernstein represented about 30 other non profit SPCA/Humane Societies that would benefit from this law allowing them to be able to seize property and homes for their profit to make their non profits wealthy. This also made them eligible to collect monthly from city and county government and the State Mandate Fund which would give them up to one million dollars for convicting or getting "plea bargains" from persons charged with animal cruelty. This would allow for six digit salaries for the executives of these non profits such as Bernstein who is paid over $200,000 to seize and kill thousands of loved pets a year taken from loving homes under fraudulent cruelty charges. (See D & D Disposal annual report)

In February 1997, Bernstein went to work finding a new "termed out" old Senator that didn't care about what he was doing to his constituents or the rest of California. Bernstein found the perfect patsy, Senator Ayala. Ayala already had SB 633, The Water Bill, a 100 page monster, on the floor that he sponsored. Bernstein was in hot pursuit of Ayala to ramrod her "Humane Officer Bill"* through the Senate hidden on the last few pages of his Water Bill.

California Constitution Article 4, Section 9 prohibits sneaking attachments onto Bills that are not the same subject matter in the title and content into bills that are already presented to the House or Senate. Anything added "shall" be the same as the Title of the Bill. The Water Bill,* as it is titled, addresses water companies and their corporate responsibilities. Article 4, Section 9* specifically states that ANY Bill or subject matter that is added to an existing Bill and passed into law is VOID and shall not be enforced.

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 4,SEC. 9
A statute shall embrace but one subject, which shall beexpressed in its title. If a statute embraces a subject not expressed in its title, only the part not expressed is VOID.

Bernstein and Ayala managed to not only SNEAK the Humane Officer Bill attachment into SB 633, but they got it passed and placed into the Corporate Code 14500 through 14503 and into effect in October 1997.
Corporate Codes 14500 through 14503 are Constitutionally Void in the state of California. The Attorney Generals including Jerry Brown, have ignored all complaints and pleas from the citizens of the State of California to investigate theSPCA/Humane Society's illegal Home Invasion Robberies, beatings of senior citizens, carrying and use of spca/LA's automatic weapons.

In late 2008 a disabled LAPD officer's mother died of a stroke from one of Bernstein's Home Invasion Robberies after being terrorized by Madeline Bernstein and Los Angeles Assistant City Attorney Donald Cocek.

This is not just murder, it is pre-meditated murder. How many more "deaths of senior citizens" is it going to take for the state of California legislature and the Attorney General's Office to wake up?

January 10th, 2007 Madeline Bernstein and her thugs, Steven Pacheco and Derek Hensel from Pasadena Humane Society, Tony Manzanares and 11 others, beat a 57 year old woman to the floor of her home, bashed her head against a bookcase for at least two minutes over and over, Pacheco shoved a 9mm between her eyes, as Hensel pointed an automatic weapon with a grenade launcher at her. Manzanares threatened to tazer her, then knocked her to the floor . Manzanares and Hensel grabbed her by the breasts and arms and dragged her out of her home. Another man, David Havard, grabbed her by the breasts and held her that way against a retaining wall outside for over a half hour sexually touching her.

Madeline Berstein directs her thugs and is responsible for these actions. She is a licensed attorney in NY and CA and according to law "knew or should have known" she was committing the following felonies against the State of CA as well as all of her victims in Home Invasion Robberies by violating the following:

CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION ARTICLE 4, SEC. 15
A person who seeks to influence the vote or action of a member of the Legislature in the member's legislative capacity by bribery, promise of reward, intimidation, or other dishonest means, or a member of the Legislature so influenced, is guilty of a felony."

We obtained copies of her letters to Caldera.

One cannot imagine why the Dept of Justice is not investigating these travesties.

Al "Scarface" Capone would be proud.

The Mob, H$U$ and the Black Egg Copyright 8/17/2009

EDITOR'S NOTE. . .

This special note is to Roger Kindler, legal counsel for H$U$.

At one time you sent me what is basically called a "cease and desist" from publishing factual information regarding the criminality of H$U$. You sent it certified and registered via the U.S. mail. It took you three (3) pages of type, I still have the copy. I replied in kind with 3 sentences. Basically I told you to pack your brief case's if you plan on suing me.

How do you like me now?

Sincerely,

Fred Crane
Editor
Game Fowl News

Disclaimer

This site (NationalDogPress) does not advocate or endorse any activities that are in violation of Federal, State, or Local laws.

Title 17 U.S.C. section 107

In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, GFN is distributed free, without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

All logos and trademarks in this site (NationalDogPress) are property of their respective owner.

NATIONAL DOG PRESS - FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

NEWS SOURCE:

email: gfn@nethere.com

phone: 202-506-9008

web: http://www.gamefowlnews.com

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2010, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as humane society of the united states, hsus, the mob, peta, nationaldogpress, and and the black egg of the hsus

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

Posted December 21, 2009

Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda training camps?

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

By Dean A. Ayers Monday, December 21, 2009

QUESTION: Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda cop training camps? No one is publicly preaching or teaching about this agenda. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) proudly claims they “are” training law enforcement to shut down animal breeders.

ANSWER: HSUS has documented law enforcement animal rights agenda accomplishments in 2008: Here are the HSUS quotes on these training camp accomplishments as follows;

The newly established Humane Society Legislative Fund began lobbying on Capitol Hill to secure legislation, support animal friendly Congressional candidates for office, and educate the public.

We also helped prosecutors win the conviction of scores of animal abusers and animal fighters — assisting with cases involving dog fighting, hoarding, farm animal abuse, and puppy mills. We created a new HSUS Animal Protection Litigation (APL) SWAT team consisting of 12 full-time attorneys and recruited hundreds of pro bono lawyers.

More than 57,700 law enforcement officers, educators, shelter professionals, emergency services personnel and veterinarians attended HSUS training and education classes.

The only cure for “puppy mill” legislation proposal propaganda is a large dose of the truth.

HSUS has previously claimed Pennsylvania was the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA. Now it seems that Ohio is the puppy mill capitol. Or is it Arizona? Or Colorado? Or Iowa? Or Illinois? As a result of these unfounded “puppy mill” capitol claims, legislators are clamoring to erase any stigma of being potentially labeled the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA, affecting their state’s good name. But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitol can they?

The key to resolving this problem and question, like so many issues, is education. Legislators want to do the right thing. They rely on constituents to tell them what problems are occurring in their districts. In the absence of good information, a slick propaganda campaign like the HSUS puppy mill effort can really take hold in many states, especially when the HSUS admittedly are sending law enforcement to their “animal rights” education training camps for alleged re-education on the animal rights side of the agenda. And what is even scarier, is that various law enforcements agencies are allegedly accepting these “training camp” education invitations to be allegedly re-educated on animal issues.

What is clear is that numerous legislators “wanting to do the right thing” for their state’s citizens in these alleged or suspected “puppy mill” states. The legislators allegedly disclose they are not aware that they are being deceived by the animal rights groups.

In press releases by the state legislators authoring the various puppy mill bills, many express shock at discovering that their state is the “puppy mill” capitol of the U.S.

But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitols can they, as animal rights activists want you to believe in their aggressive “puppy mill” reaching campaigns in many states. Just like one such aggressive “puppy mill” disclosure agenda in Iowa, by Mary LaHay, allegedly campaigning in the state of Iowa for her IowaVCA agenda.

So who is Rights or Wrong on “puppy mill” state’s statistics?

We the People, who love, care, control, and observe our dogs, and other owner’s dogs (or dog kennel businesses) daily, must ask our ourselves, and then ask our representatives and senators to verify the claims of kennel abuses before believing that their state is a haven for abusive “puppy mill” kennels.

Pro sportsmen in each state must ask their legislators to make sure that these “puppy mill” proposal bills do not impact small kennels that may sell only a few dogs in a proper and legitimate love, and caring, home, and animal welfare environment, as they primarily exist for hunting, field trials, hobbies, etc.

Elected officials must be told by We the People, that we are not the source of pet store dog purchases. There by preventing confusion in your comments and legislative proposal requests sent to your legislators, who are now treating private dog kennels the same as large scaled commercial “puppy mill” entities.

These USDA and large scale dog kennels allegedly containing hundreds or thousands of poor helpless and defenseless dogs, being “factory farmed” in relentless abusive breeding techniques and conditions, that will ultimately result in the elimination of the small scale legitimate home breeders and the sporting dog kennels who actually do care about the love for dog(s), and the proper and responssible animal welfare of their dogs and puppies.

When the people in each state contact their senators and representatives, they are not always told this “truthful” information I describe in this article. Rather generalizations and a stereotype of “puppy mills” is instead portrayed to the legislators. This is very damaging to responsible small scale dog breeders and to private property dog owners at best. It is just plain evil at worst.

Most legislators must also contend with behind the scenes issues, like the alleged dog kennel or animal rights lobbying in attempting to curb the legislators on the animal rights or animal welfare issues, depending on which side you campaign for.

In reaction the legislators want to make sure they (the legislators) are not over-reaching in new animal laws or they take the “extreme” measure and pass “anything goes” in good or bad animal laws for dog and animal owners, let alone dog breeders.

Many legislators have been open to animal legislation changes protecting smaller private property pets, small scale sporting dogs or small independent family controlled dog kennels. You just don’t know how the legislators are going to react.

The burden is on us to make sure they know the truth. Additionally, it is important the We the People communicate our concerns also to our local animal shelter, animal rescues, and animal control authorities, as to the “truth” in our information, as it is obvious now, that the HSUS, has a proactive agenda to radically influence all law enforcement authorities in their animal rights activists agendas.

Dean A. Ayers is the Lead Investigative Reporter for NationalDogPress

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18156

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2009 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement

0 comments

Posted in General

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

Posted December 21, 2009

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as canadafreepress.com, glenwood iowa, hsus, puppy mills, mary lahay, iowavca, peta, and nationaldogpress

Untitled Post

Posted December 21, 2009

Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda training camps?
Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

By Dean A. Ayers Monday, December 21, 2009

QUESTION: Does anyone know anything about these HSUS animal rights agenda cop training camps? No one is publicly preaching or teaching about this agenda. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) proudly claims they “are” training law enforcement to shut down animal breeders.

ANSWER: HSUS has documented law enforcement animal rights agenda accomplishments in 2008: Here are the HSUS quotes on these training camp accomplishments as follows;

The newly established Humane Society Legislative Fund began lobbying on Capitol Hill to secure legislation, support animal friendly Congressional candidates for office, and educate the public.

We also helped prosecutors win the conviction of scores of animal abusers and animal fighters — assisting with cases involving dog fighting, hoarding, farm animal abuse, and puppy mills. We created a new HSUS Animal Protection Litigation (APL) SWAT team consisting of 12 full-time attorneys and recruited hundreds of pro bono lawyers.
More than 57,700 law enforcement officers, educators, shelter professionals, emergency services personnel and veterinarians attended HSUS training and education classes.
The only cure for “puppy mill” legislation proposal propaganda is a large dose of the truth.
HSUS has previously claimed Pennsylvania was the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA. Now it seems that Ohio is the puppy mill capitol. Or is it Arizona? Or Colorado? Or Iowa? Or Illinois? As a result of these unfounded “puppy mill” capitol claims, legislators are clamoring to erase any stigma of being potentially labeled the “puppy mill” capitol of the USA, affecting their state’s good name. But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitol can they?

The key to resolving this problem and question, like so many issues, is education. Legislators want to do the right thing. They rely on constituents to tell them what problems are occurring in their districts. In the absence of good information, a slick propaganda campaign like the HSUS puppy mill effort can really take hold in many states, especially when the HSUS admittedly are sending law enforcement to their “animal rights” education training camps for alleged re-education on the animal rights side of the agenda. And what is even scarier, is that various law enforcements agencies are allegedly accepting these “training camp” education invitations to be allegedly re-educated on animal issues.

What is clear is that numerous legislators “wanting to do the right thing” for their state’s citizens in these alleged or suspected “puppy mill” states. The legislators allegedly disclose they are not aware that they are being deceived by the animal rights groups.

In press releases by the state legislators authoring the various puppy mill bills, many express shock at discovering that their state is the “puppy mill” capitol of the U.S.

But they cannot all be the “puppy mill” capitols can they, as animal rights activists want you to believe in their aggressive “puppy mill” reaching campaigns in many states. Just like one such aggressive “puppy mill” disclosure agenda in Iowa, by Mary LaHay, allegedly campaigning in the state of Iowa for her IowaVCA agenda.

So who is Rights or Wrong on “puppy mill” state’s statistics?
We the People, who love, care, control, and observe our dogs, and other owner’s dogs (or dog kennel businesses) daily, must ask our ourselves, and then ask our representatives and senators to verify the claims of kennel abuses before believing that their state is a haven for abusive “puppy mill” kennels.

Pro sportsmen in each state must ask their legislators to make sure that these “puppy mill” proposal bills do not impact small kennels that may sell only a few dogs in a proper and legitimate love, and caring, home, and animal welfare environment, as they primarily exist for hunting, field trials, hobbies, etc.

Elected officials must be told by We the People, that we are not the source of pet store dog purchases. There by preventing confusion in your comments and legislative proposal requests sent to your legislators, who are now treating private dog kennels the same as large scaled commercial “puppy mill” entities.

These USDA and large scale dog kennels allegedly containing hundreds or thousands of poor helpless and defenseless dogs, being “factory farmed” in relentless abusive breeding techniques and conditions, that will ultimately result in the elimination of the small scale legitimate home breeders and the sporting dog kennels who actually do care about the love for dog(s), and the proper and responssible animal welfare of their dogs and puppies.

When the people in each state contact their senators and representatives, they are not always told this “truthful” information I describe in this article. Rather generalizations and a stereotype of “puppy mills” is instead portrayed to the legislators. This is very damaging to responsible small scale dog breeders and to private property dog owners at best. It is just plain evil at worst.

Most legislators must also contend with behind the scenes issues, like the alleged dog kennel or animal rights lobbying in attempting to curb the legislators on the animal rights or animal welfare issues, depending on which side you campaign for.

In reaction the legislators want to make sure they (the legislators) are not over-reaching in new animal laws or they take the “extreme” measure and pass “anything goes” in good or bad animal laws for dog and animal owners, let alone dog breeders.

Many legislators have been open to animal legislation changes protecting smaller private property pets, small scale sporting dogs or small independent family controlled dog kennels. You just don’t know how the legislators are going to react.

The burden is on us to make sure they know the truth. Additionally, it is important the We the People communicate our concerns also to our local animal shelter, animal rescues, and animal control authorities, as to the “truth” in our information, as it is obvious now, that the HSUS, has a proactive agenda to radically influence all law enforcement authorities in their animal rights activists agendas.

Dean A. Ayers is the Lead Investigative Reporter for NationalDogPress

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/18156

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2009 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement

0 comments

Posted in General

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

Posted December 19, 2009

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit), NationalDogPress News

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.

Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every Pet Owner in the USA and Canada.

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles and postings at the following links.

Then be sure to come back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

Posted by http://DogPress.org/

Labels: Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom, NationalDogPress, DogPress.org

0 comments

Posted in General

The Dark Side of ‘Foreign Puppy Mills’ Contribute to Iowa “Puppy Mill” Propaganda Accusa

Posted December 16, 2009

The Dark Side of ‘Foreign Puppy Mills’ Contribute to Iowa “Puppy Mill” Propaganda Accusa

Used photographs and video footage of alleged inhumane conditions for years

By Dean A. Ayers Sunday, December 13, 2009

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

Animal Rights organizations have used photographs and video footage of alleged inhumane conditions for years to help spread their propaganda “puppy mill” message and persuade the general public and political parties on issues related to legislative animal law ”perversion” to be enacted.

The Rise of Ecoterrorism in Animal Rights “Puppy Mill” Bull in Iowa and elsewhere!
Animal Rights organizations have used photographs and video footage of alleged inhumane conditions for years to help spread their propaganda “puppy mill” message and persuade the general public and political parties on issues related to legislative animal law ”perversion” on exaggerated or misleading issues about animal welfare involving responsible dog owners, breeders, and dog kennels that breed dogs in a professional manner and in an eco-environment.

More recently, “Puppy Mill” propaganda groups have allegedly been using footage to assist in bringing charges against owners of dog kennels in many states where the footage was shot, in a manner reminiscent of a daytime ”soap opera” where truth and fiction is never distinguished by facts, rather only by alleged video emotional “set ups” in video and photography techniques or tricks of photography by animal rights activist groups and sympathizers.

This alleged photographic evidence is often obtained when animal rights activists or animal rescue activists either trespass on the private property premises or gain entrance under false pretenses, like gaining employment without disclosing affiliations with animal rights groups or seeking employment in a dog kennel in order to exaggerate the truth on health issues.

When these cases come to trial, they often implicate other legal issues, such as the admissibility of photographs in trials and fourth amendment search and seizure rights that are many times violated by the animal rights activists in order to gain illegal, illicit, or immoral access to their “intended kennel targets.” These “puppy mill” seeking activists also raise questions in alleged lies and propaganda about why dogs and other animals are not better protected by the inspections included in most USDA or state agricultural regulation laws (or lack of laws).

Currently in Iowa, a “battle” is brewing between legitimate and responsible dog kennel owners and dog breeders against animal rights activists such as one, Mary LaHay, from Des Moines, Iowa, who allegedly claims to now be an “expert” in “puppy mill” activities in the state of Iowa, just because 2 years ago she was allegedly not happy with a puppy she apparently picked and purchased from an unknown dog kennel.

And the Insanity of this “dog and pony” puppy mill propaganda is that Iowa legislators, and sympathetic Veterinarians, and Animal Rescue groups (who sell dogs for profit, under the name rescue or adoption scheme) are supporting this animal “puppy mill” activist. In reality, the screaming of Iowa is a puppy mill state, is allegedly way past time in her credibility of her alleged facts on the issue at hand; for now, the responsible 440 legitimate dog kennel owners in Iowa need to ”circle the wagons” and “fire back” at all this animal rights “puppy mill” propaganda BULL being dished out as fact! It is insanity in society, to allow alleged “spoon fed” animal rights propaganda to be put forth to the people of Iowa, without the other side’s facts being heard.

This is what this article is about. It’s not about LaHay, it’s about “puppy mill” facts, effecting Iowa dog owners with “perverted” animal laws and legislation proposals.

The Dark Side of ‘Foreign Puppy Mills’
Animal welfare workers hold two foreign puppy mill survivors that were sold at auction recently in Los Angeles: a miniature Yorkshire terrier and a miniature Maltese.

Debbie Garringer of Claremont, Calif., holds one of the two dogs she won at the auction. Garringer paid $2,000 for this miniature Maltese.

Hundreds of people turned out to bid on 10 purebred puppies at L.A.‘s East Valley Animal Shelter. The auction raised more than $20,000 in money that will go to the city’s animal shelters.

Purebred dogs go for top dollar in pet stores around the country, but buyers of cute, cuddly puppies may not know that some come from unregulated breeding mills overseas. So-called puppy-mill dogs are showing up sick and dehydrated at major airports around the country.

In Los Angeles, one recent shipment of dead and ailing puppies from South Korea got the city’s attention. Twenty of the dogs in the shipment seized at Los Angeles International Airport either had died or had to be euthanized after the trip. The 10 survivors were turned over to the city’s shelter.

Five months later, those survivors, of five miniature Maltese and five tiny Yorkshire terriers were ready for adoption. Hundreds of animal lovers, many wrapped in blankets to keep warm, lined up on a chilly morning in front of L.A.‘s East Valley Animal Shelter for a chance to bid on the dogs.

Ed Boks, the general manager of L.A. Animal Services, was thrilled at the turnout. City law requires him to hold an auction when more than one person wants an animal.

“I want to begin with a few facts that you won’t commonly hear from your local pet store with respect to where animals, puppies just like this, can often times go for $3,500 or more,” he told the crowd.

Boks said the 10 minipurebreds arrived with forged health certificates. The documents put their ages at 5 months, but they were actually only 5 weeks old.

“These puppies are the product of a cruel, factory-style dog breeding operation that produces animals with chronic health problems, temperament issues and hereditary defects, so our message to all of you this morning is buyer beware,” he warned.

Overseas Puppy Mills Proliferate
Puppy mills began proliferating overseas about five years ago; at about the same time that U.S. authorities started cracking down on unscrupulous domestic breeders.

Tom Sharp of the American Kennel Club says that’s when he started seeing bulldogs arriving from Russia and Yorkies from South Korea. With the help of the Internet, Sharp says, dishonest pet stores and breeders could easily get puppies overseas.

“That way, they don’t have to be inspected by the different organizations and the governments here in the U.S., and avoid all the requirements,” he says.

Right now, the only federal requirement an importer has to follow is to provide proof of a current rabies vaccine documentation that is easily forged.

Federal regulators say that rule was written at a time when the only dogs coming into the United States were companion pets. Nina Marano of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says Congress just passed a law banning the importation of dogs under 6 months old for resale.

But Marano says it will take at least two years for the ban to be enforced.

“We can try to regulate our way out of it, but another part is, I think, the issue about demand is that there needs to be a lot more public education about the demand that is being created for these puppies,” she says.

A winning bid for shelter dogs
The demand was high for Los Angeles’ puppy-mill survivors.

One winning bidder was Debbie Garringer. “I was really lucky, and I’m happy, so happy, and I will take care of it so much and it will have a beautiful home,” she said.

All 10 of the purebred puppy-mill survivors got new homes, as did 52 other pets from the shelter. In all, Animal Services raised more than $20,000 and got its message out.

Side Note: Adoption is just another word of political correctness, for purchasing a dog from a shelter/rescue that IS a dog selling business. The adoption or rescue people need to drive the breeding and kennel owners “out of business” in order to corner the profiteering market in selling adopted or rescued dogs to the public. It’s all about the money trail in rescue and adoptions. Eliminate the competition thru animal laws.

Even the shelters are using the ‘rescue’ to make big money. So the emphasis on stopping ‘puppy mills’ needs to be put forth on the foreign sources of ‘puppy mills’ and the American airports where these foreign ‘puppy mill’ dogs are arriving.

If you are going to purchase a dog, then seek out a locally well known dog breeder. But please don’t shop for pets in stores.

The more I hear about Iowa’s Mary LaHay and her “Puppy Mill” Propaganda, the more I like dog breeders and the dog kennel owners.

This country was built by dog people who got dirty, but in a clean way. Dirty men and women with calloused hands and dingy overalls and women with dog food stains and baby puppy spit-up on them were responsible for this nation’s Golden Age called Liberty and Freedom. Now the state of Iowa and many other states in this nation have to deal with “animal rights activists” like Mary LaHay, in Des Moines, Iowa with her “puppy mill” bull attempting to portray responsible and legitimate dog kennel owners as some starch-collared, manicured USDA “puppy mill” influenced dog and puppy commodities trader.

Mary LaHay, in Iowa is courting with the Iowa legislators who have “no spine” to tell these animal rights activists to stifle their alleged “perverted” dog kennel inspection legislation requests. Animal rights(AR) activist groups “perverting” the natural God given laws, while these alleged Puppy Mill Screaming “perverts” sit at a computer all day and trade animal legislation ordinances, laws, regulations about dogs, cats, pets, animals that may even include horses, cattle, sheep, goats, beans, gold, oil, timber and other things these “PERVERTED” law maker seekers and Animal Rights groups have no idea how to produce proper raised dogs, or any other animals.

Mary LaHay, in Des Moines, Iowa does not even produce a single properly raised puppy from birth in a kennel or operate on a farm with animals or in any other loving pet owner homes, in a traditional and natural God given manner, independent of government intrusion or violation of the U.S. Constitution. Mary LaHay is allegedly just an “animal activist” screaming “puppy mill” all over the state of Iowa.

The best people I’ve ever known had hands that looked like well-worn leather with cracks and crevices that crisscrossed their palms with tributaries of topsoil with a bunch of loving pet dogs running beside them through the fields, and towns where they live and own property, or have dog kennels or, in their homes, on their private property premises.

These legitimate dog kennel owners in Iowa, and many other states as well, are traditional animal farmers and proper dog and puppy breeders, also called animal producers, pet lovers, and family people, who worked all day in the kennels, and fields or at their jobs and got so dirty when they came home at night they had to undress outside because they had a quarter-acre of soil in their boots from their land. Always insuring their dogs, pets, and animals were all taken properly care of in all things, before the owner went into their own home to even eat, sleep or rest.

Dog Kennel owners, and Dog Breeders, LOVE THEIR DOGS, plain and simple. And they have the intelligence and ability to properly maintain numerous dogs on their own private property. Just because an owner has up to 150 dogs, has no bearing or fact that they are unable to properly maintain them. It’s the Animal Rights Activists” like Mary LaHay, that just “scream” puppy mill because, she allegedly was “unhappy” with HER CHOICE of a puppy from some unknown breeder.

If Mary LaHay, in Iowa, or any other Animal Rights Activist would like to “debate” the legitimacy of their alleged reasons and alleged validity of any “puppy mills” in Iowa, then this Lead Investigative Reporter who has owned and loved dogs all his life, living in Iowa, is more than willing to entertain her potential request to debate (on her tab).

The dirty boots and clothing of Animal Rights Activists
The alleged dirty boots and clothing of the HSUS, PETA, AR, or USDA premises inspectors or the “death squads” sent to kill or cull or seize all your pets and animals, while they continue to “track” the disease known as “DEATH” into the next premises of upcoming euthanized animal death. All in the name of an Animal’s Right? TO what be murdered by a syringe, instead of what, a loving family environment? It’s perverted thinking at best, evil at worst, and all in the minds of sick, demented people known as potential terrorists to pets, owners, and life itself.

There is no good solution except to RESIST perverted thinking and Take back Our Laws, to restore them to natural God given laws. Because killing healthy pet animals like blood-sport, or scorched earth policy of a Nuke strike, is NOT a solution either. You would think intelligent college educated people, mayors, councilmen/women, state governors, congressional members, and animal Vets, could use their “Brains” and still save lives, not “destroy” them.

CFP Tools Go To URL:

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/17890

(18) Reader Feedback | Subscribe | Print friendly | E-mail a friend | Contact Us

Dean A. Ayers Bio
Dean A. Ayers Most recent columns
Dean A. Ayers is the Lead Investigative Reporter for NationalDogPress

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 2009 the individual authors.

Site Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com Privacy Statement

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as des moines, glenwood iowa, foreign puppy mills, puppy mills, usda, dog kennel owners, and mary lahay

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

Posted December 6, 2009

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.

Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every Pet Owner in the USA and Canada.

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles and postings at the following links.

Then be sure to come back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as animals c.l.u.b.- freedom and nationaldogpress

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners

Posted November 1, 2009

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.

Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every pet Owner
in the USA and Canada.

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles
and postings at the following links. Then be sure to come
back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.

hhttp://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

hhttp://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as animalsclubfreedom.org | animalsclubfreedom.us | dogpress.org | doglaw-animalsclubfreedom and nationaldogpress

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Posted October 4, 2009

Original Article Links:

http://animalsclubfreedom.typepad.com/

and

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/15426

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Animal laws that limit the number of animals allowed in a household or vaguely define a “bad smell” in the pet owner’s home are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

4 Oct. 09

Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable; a knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) and/or facing stiff fines for various reasons in an abuse, neglect, or number limit citation.

With animal ownership laws now undergoing radical evolving changes throughout the country, the result is now a ‘perverted’ evolving animal “activist” produced animal care and control law now being used. Animal rights ‘extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others working in animal rights group legislation lobbies are the new means for dog owner 'harassment.' The constant upgrade of these radical ‘animal controlling’ laws drastically increases the ‘real’ possibility of a visit to your door on your own private property from Animal Control Authorities becoming ever more of a specter to haunt you and also every dog owner in the nation.

Specifically targeted by legislation ‘activists’ are creating the laws that 'limit' the number of dogs, cats, pets, and animals allowed in a household (by an unsubstantiated arbitrary pet ‘limit’ number) which is intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," according to this arbitrary standard put into the animal law. Even more sinister is that these ‘activist’ pushed animal laws are also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws.

These dog or animal "number limit" laws are now being joined by various other anti-pet ownership restrictive laws, such as mandatory breeder permits and licensing requirements (being pursued for example at this time in Iowa legislation) for even a single one time litter of any dog and the owner is now faced with major state intrusive inspections for a kennel or breeder license for having more than 3 pets in the home, or having a single litter of puppies. All of this being “PAINTED” as the need to stop alleged puppy mills, which of course in most instances is “bull”. Other totally vague animal control laws that can threaten responsible dog owners who are not in any kind of notable breeding or kenneling business are those ‘activist’ lobbied animal laws that allow the animal control officer to ‘define’ the offense of “BAD SMELL” in the home as a violation in animal control care and control laws. Many good and loving pet owners whose dogs are well cared for and kept as their extended family members are suddenly in violation of an animal control officers “definition of “BAD SMELL” in the home, based upon the pets living in their homes, rather than caged outside alone and exposed to the climate, like a beast.

Why, there are many people, who object to a ‘single turd’ in a field that can be smelled downwind from 3 miles away, and object to that smell as a “BAD SMELL” under animal law or other people who are obsessed, compelled or driven to use massive amounts of dangerous cleaning products (by the liter or gallon) in a home (that are dangerous to the health of the animals and humans alike)to kill any and all ‘bad’ smells; so take into account an ‘activist’ animal control officer, who is this described ‘clean freak’ inspecting pet owner homes, using this vague and intrusive animal law as a criminal, abusive, or neglectful animal law violation according to their ‘definition of a ‘BAD SMELL’ in the pet owners home.

This vague and intrusive ‘unbalanced’ definition of tyranny control in the animal law begs for fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, and ultimate adoption or euthanasia of properly maintained pet owner animals in their home. Tyranny at its core to allow an ‘activist’ animal control officer to ‘harass’ and ‘intimidate’ virtually any pet owner in their jurisdiction, based solely upon a “BAD SMELL?” Please! These ‘activist’ animal laws have completely gone over the edge of the cliff in dealing in ‘reality’ and ‘common sense’.

'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) is actively opposing all restrictive legislation limiting the responsible pet ownership of all dogs, cats, and other pets. Unfortunately some 'perverted' anti-pet ownership laws have still made their way onto the books. Just take a look at the 94 + page anti-pet ordinance of Louisville, KY by its Metro council, or the tyranny animal control laws with a three strike violation rule, taking away any right to owning any pet or animal in Omaha, Nebraska, or the 3-strike violation rule in Mills County, Iowa if your little 'fluffy' is caught off your private property 3 times. Your little "Fluffy" will be declared a "dangerous dog" according to their animal care and control ordinance for the county. How’s that for success in animal control laws stopping animal crimes in the midst of a rural county? These ‘activist’ based and promoted animal tyranny laws are occurring all across the nation as we speak. Ever more intrusive and controlling by the day.

For all dog owners, do we need reminded that it is important to promote the need for responsible freedom in the care and ownership of your dog(s) and pets in order to prevent tyranny from overcoming common sense in dog ownership matters? Or is it going to take a ‘knock at your door’ and an unlawful dog confiscation without any ‘due process’ for the dog owner to open your eyes to the truth in animal law "tyranny" now days?

Breeding even a single dog litter is now the ‘target’ of license laws

There is great value to society in the historic preservation of all our pet ownership of our chosen dog breeds as extended members of our family, and in the selective, planned breeding of our pets, for desirable and predictable traits in our chosen and favored dog breeds as well.

Claims that the organized dog fancy or local backyard hobby dog breeders contributes to the problem of homeless dogs in shelters cannot be supported by any alleged evidence from any Animal Rights activist groups, such as PETA, ELF, ALF, HSUS, ASPCA or any local humane society through facts that are real, not manufactured like liberal propaganda.

Above all else, dog owners, backyard dog hobbyists and dog fanciers must all become aware of the animal control laws in their own locale, and must also be aware of their 'rights' if faced with that ‘intrusive’ visit from an Animal Control Officer or Law Enforcement Officer regarding your pets and animals, and their ability to ‘harass’ you with vague and ‘interpretive’ definitions of the animal laws.

It is necessary for all dog and pet owners to be familiar with all animal identification regulations for your dogs in your locale, as the future to continued further 'restrictive' local, county, state, or federal animal care, control, or identification regulations are potentially, only a 'stroke of the pen' away from being amended to include identification of many non-farm related pets and animals to be further controlled and cared for by government laws, due to any potential future transmission of a communicable animal disease in dogs or other pets or animals that may arise.

At that time, you and your dogs, and animals will then have to deal with Federal, State, and local animal control regulations on your private property, called a premises. Not only will you have a real possibility of 'animal control' showing up with restrictive regulations and ordinances of your dogs and your ownership freedom, but you will also have to deal with the 'dog-ma' of inspector police from the USDA animal and agriculture authorities or your state controlled 'dog-cops' checking your animals on your private property premises as well.

ALWAYS, Always, always, educate yourself and learn your animal control laws for your area and 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog ownership. Always insure you have a name, and contact number for an Attorney at Law that is familiar with ‘Animal Law” in order to represent you and your dogs, not if, but when, the ‘activists’ in animal control come knocking at your door.

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights Activists or Animal Control, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

NationalDogPress ©

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom on 10/04/2009 at 12:49 PM in "Due Process" Before Animal Control Takes Your Dog, A Chicken Lesson for Dog Owners, Animal Control, Animal Control Officers, Bad Smelling Pets, Books, C.L.U.B. QUOTE, Current Affairs, Dog and Human Euthanasia Unethical, Dog Insurance Requirements, Dog Law, Dog License Tyranny, Dog Ordinance Tyranny, Dog Rescue Action Needed, Dogs, Pets, and Animals, Due Process in Animal Laws, Film, Flaming Liberal Swords, Food and Drink, Freedom and Happiness, Games, GlenwoodIowa.org, Health Care, HEALTH CARE ALERT, Humane Health Care?, Humane Society Scam, INSANITY in Society, Life's Troubles, Mills County, Iowa, Music, NAIS Animal ID, NationalDogPress Newsletter, Nebraska Humane Society - NOT!, No Dogs in Canada and the USA , Our Nation Won't Survive, Pet Food, PETA DEATH CAMPS, Private Property Intrusion, Religion, RFID Chips, Sarah Palin , Sarah Palin HELP!, Science, Socialist America, Sports, Swine Flu Fraud?, Television, Thank You!, Travel, Web/Tech, Weblogs

0 comments

Posted in General

Tagged as dogpress.org, canadafreepress.com, mills county, glenwood iowa, animalid.biz | animalsclubfreedom.us | animalsclubfreedom.us, puppy mills, and nationaldogpress

View older posts »

John Lebeaux	johnlebeaux@townisp.com
Maurice DePalo *voted against death penalty	mbdepalo@townisp.com
Moria Miller	moira@townisp.com
James F. Kane	jfkane@townisp.com
Benjamin W. Tartaglia	bentartaglia@townisp.com

dog press org

The toxic effects of "clean homes" and dog license toxins on our dogs and pets

DEATH ROW DOGGIE IN MASS.

NationalDogPress Magazine Articles

The “NAKED TRUTH” about Animal Shelter Tactics by Animal Rightists

The “NAKED TRUTH” about Animal Shelter Tactics by Animal Rightists

Do Animal Control Authorities (dog catchers) have to be nincompoops?

Do Animal Control Authorities (Dog Catchers) have to be Nincompoops?

The Licensing of Tyranny in Dog Ownership

Dog owner “Due Process” is not contained in current Animal Law – The Questions and Answers

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

HSUS, Humane Society of the United States; HSUS, The MOB and the Black Egg of the HSUS

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

Humane Society of the United States claim they are training law enforcement

Untitled Post

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

The Dark Side of ‘Foreign Puppy Mills’ Contribute to Iowa “Puppy Mill” Propaganda Accusa

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners

Animal control laws and officers challenge your right to dog ownership

Copyright © 2006-2010, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

Please Donate

FAKE ART DISCLAIMER:

Nude Fake Art Photos

Visitor's Today